How to use this Body fat calculator
- Choose the male or female equation and matching units.
- Measure height without shoes. Keep the measuring tape snug without compressing the skin.
- Measure the neck below the larynx. For the male equation use abdomen at the navel; for the female equation use the natural waist and hip at the widest point.
- Enter the measurements and select Calculate. Repeat measurements consistently when comparing trends.
The formula and method
The implemented male equation is body fat % = 86.010 × log10(abdomen − neck) − 70.041 × log10(height) + 36.76. The female equation is 163.205 × log10(waist + hip − neck) − 97.684 × log10(height) − 78.387. All measurements inside these equations are in inches.
Metric inputs are converted from centimetres to inches before the logarithms are evaluated. These direct percentage equations are a legacy circumference approach; they are not the same numerical expression as the density-and-Siri form sometimes published for the method.
The input measurements must produce a positive logarithm argument and a usable percentage. The tool reports an error when a combination produces a non-positive or implausible result rather than silently clamping the result.
Worked example
For a male equation with height 180 cm, abdomen 90 cm and neck 40 cm: convert to inches, then use 86.010 × log10(50 ÷ 2.54) − 70.041 × log10(180 ÷ 2.54) + 36.76. The estimate is about 18.46% body fat.
Understanding the estimate
- This is a legacy circumference estimate, not a current military compliance assessment.
- Measurement site, tape tension and individual body shape can materially affect the estimate.
- It does not directly measure body composition or identify where fat is stored.
Frequently asked questions
Why does the female equation need a hip measurement?
The two historical regression equations use different measurement combinations. The female equation includes hip circumference; the male equation does not.
Why is my result rejected?
Check the units and measurement sites. The equation requires a positive circumference difference and a plausible output; some body shapes are outside its useful range.
Is this the same as a laboratory body-composition measurement?
No. It estimates a percentage from tape measurements and a historical model. Individual error can be meaningful.
